Friday, February 24, 2017

A Much More Crazy Week

Hello again! For the first time since this blog began, I didn't post earlier in the week and *gasp* I'm not treating you to two blog posts in one week? What? Whatever will you do? I bet you missed me a ton this week, didn't you? You were probably staying awake late at night wondering why Shreya wasn't giving you what you most wanted: a blog post about her really fun internship.


Ignore that GIF. It's being really rude. But anyways, it's ok. I'm here to save you now. Welcome to this week's blog post.

That was really dramatic. Maybe too dramatic. Oh, well.

I did many things this week. On Tuesday, I sat in on two meetings at the Chamber: a Legal, Regulatory, & Financial Services Policy Committee meeting and an Education & Workforce Development Policy Committee meeting.

In the first meeting, people discussed a lot of bills associated with criminal justice, which was really interesting. One of the people who led the meeting took a moment to acknowledge the significant cost of crime on both victims and corporations, saying that this is not a time to be dramatically changing the criminal justice system (through bills and such) in regards to punishments, time served, etc. Luckily, in Arizona, we've had forty-to-fifty-year lows in crime rates, so we've averted many costs of crime. However, the committee members acknowledged the need for some reform within the judicial system. They categorized issues concerning the judicial system into how judges are selected, how they are retained, and what power we give them. The committee members also discussed issues with how the judicial system runs in AZ specifically. For most of the nation, the state legislature serves as a check for the courts, the legislature being the ultimate authority. However, this check and balance is not seen in AZ, where the courts assert that they have the final say on rulings, which is problematic.

In the second meeting, the hot topic was ESA bills (which is pretty much a hot topic in the entire country right now I guess). For those of you who aren't familiar with them, ESAs (Education Savings Accounts) let parents pull their kids out of public or charter schools and continue their educations in a different way (private schooling, online courses, homeschooling, etc. although there are some restrictions) by giving these parents a deposit of public funds in government-authorized savings accounts. The Chamber traditionally supports high-quality, private choice and financial accountability and pre-enrollment academic transparency and so on. An issue the committee discussed was the actual funding methodology for ESAs. They advocated for an extension on the account caps with a go-slow phase-in so that the fiscal impact is predictable.

Then, on Thursday, I helped out at the Lodging & Tourism Unity Dinner (which was very exciting and had some truly amazing salad) that honored Senator Jeff Flake for encouraging the hotel and tourism business in AZ. Sen. Flake was interviewed onstage and he spoke about how good NAFTA has been with regards to trade for North America, saying "we should not scrap it or try to punish one country or another by negotiating it." However, he did agree that NAFTA should be modernized to fit with the way things work now as opposed to when it was created. He also spoke about how important immigration is for tourism in the country and in AZ specifically, advocating that the immigration ban on seven predominantly Muslim countries is unjust, not to mention bad for tourism, and that we need to work away from that.


And then, this morning, I was very excited to help out at the Eggs and Issues Breakfast with Congressman David Schweikert, who, I had heard from the Chamber members, is a very good public speaker. In his keynote address, Rep. Schweikert mostly discussed how AZ is a hotbed for innovation and technology and we need to make use of that creative, innovative spirit for a more efficient government. One thing that stood out to me during his talk was his ideas about telemedicine and calls for a technological revolution. He also discussed a better way forward on tax reform (what he called doing taxes on basically gigantic postcards) to make things easier and more efficient for taxpayers. Another thing that was interesting was his discussion of the nation's immigration system. For positive economic growth, he advocated for a more talent-based immigration system such as the ones Canada, New Zealand, and Australia have. However, he also acknowledged how the system is currently very family-based, saying we need to now negotiate a balance between familial and talent-based immigration systems.

I even got to meet Rep. Schweikert and speak with him for about ten minutes. He was one of the nicest, most down-to-earth politicians I've ever met (out of the grand total of about two politicians I've met in my limited experience). He said his 16-month-old daughter would've really loved (pulling on and playing with) my hair, which was exciting. I mean, it's not every day a member of Congress compliments you on how attractive your hair would be to a baby. And I'm not lying! I have proof!


Yay proof! Anyways, besides being able to meet all these political figures, I'm so grateful for and excited about this internship because I'm learning so much that I didn't know before! It's interesting how pathetically little I knew about policy and politics before this. Being able to see people work on everything from education policies to criminal justice policies to immigration and tax reform is amazing and it's always exciting to see and work with these things firsthand.

Well, that was my little spiel of the week. I'll also speak about where I've come so far with my actual research next week. I hope you all have a great weekend and I'll see you next week for another post!

16 comments:

  1. Hi Shreya! Your internship sounds like an amazing experience overall. Though I am not particularly interested in politics, I am glad you are having a wonderful time! You mentioned that the Chamber was discussing some bills to help with immigration. How exactly did they intend to change or regulate the family and talent of people coming into the US? It seems like a very difficult thing to control. Looking forward to your next post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Brent! During his keynote address, Rep. Schweikert just threw out some ideas about how we might want to angle our nation's immigration system. However, the actual specifics of that he didn't discuss. I think that's a job for the congressional committees! It'll be interesting to see what he does with that during his tenure, though.

      Delete
  2. I love reading your blog every week! Do you know why Arizona has had forty-to-fifty year lows in crime rates? Interesting, since AZ borders Mexico and people are always scared of being close to the Mexican border.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Stirling! I'm so happy you like the blog! Arizona doesn't actually have very low crime rates compared to the rest of the country's states (I think it's the 10th least peaceful state or something?). However, Maricopa County has had higher declines in crime rates than the rest of the nation (which is great for us). A few years ago, there was a lot of criminal justice policy reform, so a lot of news articles cite that as the probable reason for the lows in crime. Yay for us!

      Delete
  3. Hi Shreya!

    I honestly love reading your blog each week! Your sense of humor makes it incredibly fun to follow. In your meeting about criminal justice, did they mention if they wanted to fix the checks and balances issues presented in the AZ judicial system? I'm excited to hear more about your research and how its progressing! Looking forward to your next post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anjalee! I'm so glad you find my wacko sense of humor (and this blog) entertaining! During the first meeting, they did say that they wanted to push for policies that let Arizona go more mainstream in that sense and let the legislature be an extra check and balance for the courts. We'll just have to wait and see if they're successful!

      Delete
  4. Hey Shreya! Really interesting post! With regards to Congressman's David Schweikert's point on how we should make use of the innovative spirit, did he mention new ways that AZ was going to promote or facilitate that spirit and/or a technological revolution? Also I was wondering did this help with your research regarding lobbyists at all?? Again, can't wait for your next post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anirudh! Rep. Schweikert's point was mainly that Arizona already has an innovative spirit which we need to recognize and truly harness to move the state's economy forward. He gave examples in terms of tax reform (with his postcard solution) and data mines that would let people have control over their data and lease it to the government for their records. He seemed to really like the open-source movement! During his talk, Rep. Schweikert discussed the lobbyist's role and it seemed that lobbyists were really important as a channel from his constituents to him. He talked about how lobbyists came to him vouching for a certain policy/reform that helped him shape his own agenda, so for my research, I think I can incorporate that in my defense of lobbying and lobbyists!

      Delete
  5. Hi Shreya. Interesting blog. I was just curious as to what specific privileges do judges get and how are they screened and chosen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Michael! I'm not sure what you mean by privileges, but I think that in Arizona, appellate and superior court judges are chosen by merit selection (with background checks and such). After an initial two-year term, the judges then stand for retention. For the Arizona Supreme Court, the governor gets to appoint the seven justices and they then choose the chief justice by a vote. That chief justice can then serve for five years. Let me know if you have any more questions!

      Delete
  6. Hi Shreya. I found it interesting to hear all the different topics you got to observe throughout the week. However, I still have one question regarding the ESA bills. Do you know why homeschooled kids are not able to get ESA bills but someone who takes online classes is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Alex! I didn't realize I had written that...that's actually wrong. ESAs can cover homeschooling expenses too. Whoops. I've fixed that now. Thanks for catching that!

      Delete
  7. Hi Shreya. At the start of the post you stated that crime was at an a forty-to-fifty-year lows and I wanted to know if they attributed this to anything. If so can this system be implemented elsewhere?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Javier! A few years ago, there was a lot of good criminal justice policy reform in Maricopa County, so many people attribute the lows in crime to that. I think most of it is just updating old laws and making things more efficient, which is something the country itself is working on, so hopefully things get better everywhere!

      Delete
  8. Hi Shreya! I'm yet again amazed that you discussed another issue that affects us as students directly. Do Education bills get discussed this often, or are you just lucky to get this many bills in the time that you are there, or is this just the education bills sector that you listen to? Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Marvin! So, the Chamber is very heavily involved in education and the education and workforce development area is a big part of what they advocate for. I've been pretty much sitting in on and taking notes in every meeting that's come up and a lot of them tend to be education-focused, so that's why a lot of the meetings I've discussed have to do with education. Thanks so much!

      Delete